 |
Test
Patient #1 |
| ID: |
111111 |
Name: |
Test
Patient #1 |
Gender: |
F |
Client
ID: |
11111 |
Age: |
19 |
Click Here for
a Printable Page (patient #1)
Privacy
Notice:
This document
contains proprietary and confidential material which is legally privileged.
The contents of this document may not be disclosed or distributed without
the consent of MCG, LLC, or of the patient whose records are
contained herein.
|
 |
Test
Patient #2 |
| ID: |
222222 |
Name: |
Test
Patient #2 |
Gender: |
M |
Client
ID: |
22222 |
Age: |
97 |
Click Here for
a Printable Page (patient #2)
Privacy
Notice:
This document
contains proprietary and confidential material which is legally privileged.
The contents of this document may not be disclosed or distributed without
the consent of MCG, LLC, or of the patient whose records are
contained herein. |
MCG Test
Results
| Test
ID |
Date |
ECG
Quality |
Local
Ischemia |
Global
Ischemia |
| 3095297 |
2007-05-07
16:25:01 |
Good |
None |
None |
| |
Disclaimer:
Clinical
studies have shown that MCG has a sensitivity of 90+% with 7±2%
false negative results and a specificity of 85+% with 15±3% false
positive results in detecting ischemia due to coronary artery disease
(CAD). A positive CAD ischemia result does not guarantee that the
subject has the disease, and a negative CAD ischemia result does not guarantee
that the subject does not have the disease.
MCG
analysis has the following detection rates for coronary arterial plaque
luminal encroachment levels:
| 40-50%
encroachment |
75%
detection rate |
| 50-70%
encroachment |
90%
detection rate |
| >70%
encroachment |
96%
detection rate |
MCG
assumes that the subject has normal or corrected serum electrolyte chemistry
and complete blood count (CBC). It also assumes that the subject has no
structural anomalies of the myocardium. If these laboratory test results
are unknown, dated, or abnormal at the time of this test, the results
may be skewed.
1Local
Ischemia: regional or patchy myocardial ischemia caused by mid- or distal
single or double vessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
2Global ischemia: diffuse myocardial ischemia caused by proximal
large vessel (usually two vessel or more are pathological) CAD, and/or
microvascular disease affecting the entire myocardium.
|
MCG Test
Results
| Test
ID |
Date |
ECG
Quality |
Local
Ischemia |
Global
Ischemia |
| 3061249 |
2007-05-03
18:10:15 |
Marginal |
None |
Very
severe |
| |
Disclaimer:
Clinical
studies have shown that MCG has a sensitivity of 90+% with 7±2%
false negative results and a specificity of 85+% with 15±3% false
positive results in detecting ischemia due to coronary artery disease
(CAD). A positive CAD ischemia result does not guarantee that the
subject has the disease, and a negative CAD ischemia result does not guarantee
that the subject does not have the disease.
MCG
analysis has the following detection rates for coronary arterial plaque
luminal encroachment levels:
| 40-50%
encroachment |
75%
detection rate |
| 50-70%
encroachment |
90%
detection rate |
| >70%
encroachment |
96%
detection rate |
MCG
assumes that the subject has normal or corrected serum electrolyte chemistry
and complete blood count (CBC). It also assumes that the subject has no
structural anomalies of the myocardium. If these laboratory test results
are unknown, dated, or abnormal at the time of this test, the results
may be skewed.
1Local
Ischemia: regional or patchy myocardial ischemia caused by mid- or distal
single or double vessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
2Global ischemia: diffuse myocardial ischemia caused by proximal
large vessel (usually two vessel or more are pathological) CAD, and/or
microvascular disease affecting the entire myocardium.
|
Suggestions
Disease severity:
| Test |
Severity |
| 3095297 |
2007-05-07
16:25:01 |
0
: none |
|
Disease Severity Range: |
| 0
= x |
No
disease burden |
| 0
< x <= 2 |
Mild
disease burden |
| 2
< x <= 4 |
Moderate
disease burden |
| 4
< x <= 5.5 |
Level
1 severe (moderately severe) |
| 5.5
< x <= 7.5 |
Level
2 severe (severe) |
| 7.5
< x <= 15 |
Level
3 severe (very severe) |
| 15
< x |
Level
4 severe (extremely severe) |
Secondary
results (pathological conditions):
Myocardial Damage
Ventricular Hypertrophy
Cardiomyopathy
Pulmonary Heart Disease
Fibrillation (likely atrial).
Ventricular arrhythmia.
Myocarditis or Myocardial Inflammation
Rheumatic Heart Disease or remnants
thereof
Congenital Heart Disease or remnants
thereof
Tertiary
results (physiopathological conditions):
Myocardial remodeling.
Decreased myocardial compliance.
Likely causes include ischemia, ventricular hypertrophy, increased afterload,
systemic hypertension.
Increased myocardial compliance.
Likely causes include ischemia, myocarditis, structural anomalies, cardiomyopathy.
Decreased cardiac output reflected
by decreased ejection fraction.
Bradycardia
Tachycardia
Acute Power Failure. Likely conditions
are ischemia heart disease, pump failure, supply and demand imbalance.
Global asynchrony
Regional or localized asynchrony
Disclaimer:
This section contains comments and suggested diagnoses or conditions which
require rigorous clinical validation. These suggestions and comments should
be considered expert opinions and not a definitive diagnosis.
|
Suggestions
Disease severity:
| Test |
Severity |
| 3061249 |
2007-05-03
18:10:15 |
9
: very severe |
|
Disease Severity Range: |
| 0
= x |
No
disease burden |
| 0
< x <= 2 |
Mild
disease burden |
| 2
< x <= 4 |
Moderate
disease burden |
| 4
< x <= 5.5 |
Level
1 severe (moderately severe) |
| 5.5
< x <= 7.5 |
Level
2 severe (severe) |
| 7.5
< x <= 15 |
Level
3 severe (very severe) |
| 15
< x |
Level
4 severe (extremely severe) |
Secondary
results (pathological conditions):
Myocardial Damage
Ventricular
Hypertrophy
Cardiomyopathy
Pulmonary
Heart Disease
Fibrillation
(likely atrial).
Ventricular
arrhythmia.
Myocarditis
or Myocardial Inflammation
Rheumatic
Heart Disease or remnants thereof
Congenital
Heart Disease or remnants thereof
Tertiary
results (physiopathological conditions):
Myocardial remodeling.
Decreased
myocardial compliance. Likely causes include ischemia, ventricular hypertrophy,
increased afterload, systemic hypertension.
Increased
myocardial compliance. Likely causes include ischemia, myocarditis, structural
anomalies, cardiomyopathy.
Decreased
cardiac output reflected by decreased ejection fraction.
Bradycardia
Tachycardia
Acute Power
Failure. Likely conditions are ischemia heart disease, pump failure, supply
and demand imbalance.
Global asynchrony
(lead II behind lead V5).
Regional
or localized asynchrony
Disclaimer:
This section contains comments and suggested diagnoses or conditions which
require rigorous clinical validation. These suggestions and comments should
be considered expert opinions and not a definitive diagnosis.
|
Auto
Power Spectrum of Lead V5
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
|
|
|
| 1/2 |
O |
U1 |
U2 |
U3 |
U3xy |
U4 |
N1 |
N3 |
S |
SS |
F |
FF |
A1 |
A2 |
A3 |
A4 |
A5 |
A55 |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| |
|
Auto Power
Spectrum of Lead V5
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| 1/2 |
O |
U1 |
U2 |
U3 |
U3xy |
U4 |
N1 |
N3 |
S |
SS |
F |
FF |
A1 |
A2 |
A3 |
A4 |
A5 |
A55 |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Legend
N3: Low third and/or fourth peak. Similar to N1 but historical.
S: Bradycardia; S: <60 bpm. |
|
Auto
Power Spectrum of Lead II
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
 |
|
|
| 1/2 |
O |
U1 |
U2 |
U3 |
U3xy |
U4 |
N1 |
N3 |
S |
SS |
F |
FF |
A1 |
A2 |
A3 |
A4 |
A5 |
A55 |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| |
|
Auto
Power Spectrum of Lead II
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| 1/2 |
O |
U1 |
U2 |
U3 |
U3xy |
U4 |
N1 |
N3 |
S |
SS |
F |
FF |
A1 |
A2 |
A3 |
A4 |
A5 |
A55 |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Legend
N1: Low first peak: recent damage to the mesocardium from
general anesthesia, myocardial contusion, syncope, and/or dyspnea
leading to hypoxia.
N3: Low third and/or fourth peak. Similar to N1 but historical.
S: Bradycardia; S: <60 bpm. |
|
Coherence
Function
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Coherence
Function
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| |
| Notes:
Decreased ejection fraction.
Legend
Q1: A low first peak.
Q2: Low coherence of the transfer function. |
|
Transfer
Function
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Transfer
Function
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Phase
Angle Shift
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
 |
|
|
| P+ |
P- |
WW |
PWW+ |
PWW- |
L |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| |
|
Phase
Angle Shift
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| P+ |
P- |
WW |
PWW+ |
PWW- |
L |
| - |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Notes:
Myocardial remodeling.Global asynchrony: Lead II behind Lead V5.
Legend
P-: Low phase shift under the abscissa.
WW: A sharp oscillation of phase shift wave forms; usually
reflects time delay between different myocardial fibers within a
part of the heart due to coronary artery blockage and MI. |
|
Impulse
Response Function
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
|
|
|
| D1 |
D2 |
f |
M1 |
M3 |
M2 |
M4 |
| - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| |
|
Impulse
Response Function
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| D1 |
D2 |
f |
M1 |
M3 |
M2 |
M4 |
| - |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
|
| Notes:
Myocardial remodeling.Increased myocardial compliance.
Legend
D2: Trapezoid wave; current or potential arrhythmia.
M3: Three or more main peaks. Usually reflects a conduction
block, atrial/ventricular dilation or increased compliance. |
|
Cross
Correlation
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
|
|
|
| rrr |
RRR |
r |
R |
rr |
RR |
rR |
R+ |
R- |
RW+ |
RW- |
pt |
PT |
Rn |
| - |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Legend
r: Individual difference without clinical meaning. |
|
Cross
Correlation
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| rrr |
RRR |
r |
R |
rr |
RR |
rR |
R+ |
R- |
RW+ |
RW- |
pt |
PT |
Rn |
| + |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
| Legend
rrr: A low main peak; low cross correlation due to ischemia
or potential MI.
RR: Long R-R interval; possible current or potential arrhythmia.
pt: Neuroendocrine disturbance; pt along with 1/2, A5 or
A55 suggest CAD.
PT: Neuroendocrine disturbance; PT along with 1/2, A5 or
A55 suggest CAD. |
|
Amplitude
Histogram V5
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
|
|
|
| |
| Legend
V-: Low (<5mm) R waves or hypovoltage in lead V5.
Vn-: Small number of recorded events in the histogram; reflects
chronic heart dysfunction for > one year. |
|
Amplitude
Histogram V5
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| |
| Legend
V-: Low (<5mm) R waves or hypovoltage in lead V5.
Vn-: Small number of recorded events in the histogram; reflects
chronic heart dysfunction for > one year. |
|
Amplitude
Histogram II
| SIL69418
(test: 2007-05-07 16:25:01) |
 |
|
|
| |
| Legend
2-: Low (<5mm) R waves or hypovoltage in lead II. |
|
Amplitude
Histogram II
| SIL30016
(test: 2007-05-03 18:10:15) |
|
|
|
| |
| Legend
2-: Low (<5mm) R waves or hypovoltage in lead II.
2n-: Similar to but carries less impact than a postive Vn-.
|
|
ECG Trace:
Test 3095297
Lead II
Lead V5
|
ECG Trace:
Test 3061249
Lead II
Lead V5
|
About
MCG
MCG is a new, web-based, non-invasive diagnostic tool for aiding your
physician(s) in diagnosing multiple types of heart disease, including coronary
artery disease (CAD). It adopts the principles of Systems Analysis in mathematically
analyzing the digitized resting electrocardiograph (ECG) data from leads
V5 and II simultaneously.
The results of the mathematical calculations are graphically represented
as an auto power spectrum and its variations: phase shift, impulse response,
coherence function, cross correlation and amplitude histogram. Collectively,
these mathematical transformations supply various aspects of the electromechanical
properties of the heart muscle in relationship to the physiological properties
of the blood and its impact on the myocardial functions as a whole.
The abnormal "Ischemia Indexes" derived from each of these six functions
are integrated into a mathematical pattern which represents the myocardium
as a whole system which is used for complex pattern recognition. The computer
statistically matches each individual's transformation set to the patterns
of a large population consisting of thousands of healthy people and tens
of thousands of people with heart diseases collected from years of clinical
research, software development, and database collections. The computer
analysis is then reported to a physician who determines the final diagnosis
and therapeutic recommendations, if required.
According to our peer reviewed published (and as yet other unpublished)
prospective and double blind trial data from over 1,200 patients undergoing
coronary angiograms:
- Among those
who have more than 40% but less than 50% coronary artery atherosclerotic
plaque lumenal encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG
detection rates at approximately 75%
- Among those
who have more than 50% but less than 70% coronary artery atherosclerotic
plaque lumenal encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG
detection rates at approximately 90%
- Among those
who have more then 70% coronary artery atherosclerotic plaque lumenal
encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG detection rates
at approximately 96%
- There are
roughly 15(±3)% false positive cases which include:
- Coronary
artery vasospasms; Coronary Arteriopathy (connective tissue disorders,
vaculitides or aneurysms)
- Microvascular
disease (peripheral vascular disease)
- Aortic
stenosis/regurgitation
- Hypertensive
heart disease and metabolic disorders
- Renal
disease, (i.e. end stage renal disease)
- Poor
quality ECG tracings
- There are
about 7(±2)% false negative cases which include:
- Well-established
coronary collateral circulations with visibly poor coronary angiogram
results
- Coronary
angiogram results showed moderate lumenal encroachments, however,
the MCG test was negative.
- Poor
quality ECG tracings
Finally, unlike the primary diagnosis of the presence or absence of local
or global ischemia, the secondary findings of each test (such as MI, LVH,
arrhythmias, etc) should be considered as a reference or an expert's opinions
rather than definitive diagnosis. This is due to these findings requiring
additional controlled, prospective and double blind studies for validations.
The ultimate treatment decisions are between you and your physician(s).
For more details on MCG analysis, please visit http://www.premierheart.com/webapp/tech.php
.
|
About
MCG
MCG is a new, web-based, non-invasive diagnostic tool for aiding your
physician(s) in diagnosing multiple types of heart disease, including coronary
artery disease (CAD). It adopts the principles of Systems Analysis in mathematically
analyzing the digitized resting electrocardiograph (ECG) data from leads
V5 and II simultaneously.
The results of the mathematical calculations are graphically represented
as an auto power spectrum and its variations: phase shift, impulse response,
coherence function, cross correlation and amplitude histogram. Collectively,
these mathematical transformations supply various aspects of the electromechanical
properties of the heart muscle in relationship to the physiological properties
of the blood and its impact on the myocardial functions as a whole.
The abnormal "Ischemia Indexes" derived from each of these six functions
are integrated into a mathematical pattern which represents the myocardium
as a whole system which is used for complex pattern recognition. The computer
statistically matches each individual's transformation set to the patterns
of a large population consisting of thousands of healthy people and tens
of thousands of people with heart diseases collected from years of clinical
research, software development, and database collections. The computer
analysis is then reported to a physician who determines the final diagnosis
and therapeutic recommendations, if required.
According to our peer reviewed published (and as yet other unpublished)
prospective and double blind trial data from over 1,200 patients undergoing
coronary angiograms:
- Among those
who have more than 40% but less than 50% coronary artery atherosclerotic
plaque lumenal encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG
detection rates at approximately 75%
- Among those
who have more than 50% but less than 70% coronary artery atherosclerotic
plaque lumenal encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG
detection rates at approximately 90%
- Among those
who have more then 70% coronary artery atherosclerotic plaque lumenal
encroachments in single or multiple vessels, MCG detection rates
at approximately 96%
- There are
roughly 15(±3)% false positive cases which include:
- Coronary
artery vasospasms; Coronary Arteriopathy (connective tissue disorders,
vaculitides or aneurysms)
- Microvascular
disease (peripheral vascular disease)
- Aortic
stenosis/regurgitation
- Hypertensive
heart disease and metabolic disorders
- Renal
disease, (i.e. end stage renal disease)
- Poor
quality ECG tracings
- There are
about 7(±2)% false negative cases which include:
- Well-established
coronary collateral circulations with visibly poor coronary angiogram
results
- Coronary
angiogram results showed moderate lumenal encroachments, however,
the MCG test was negative.
- Poor
quality ECG tracings
Finally, unlike the primary diagnosis of the presence or absence of local
or global ischemia, the secondary findings of each test (such as MI, LVH,
arrhythmias, etc) should be considered as a reference or an expert's opinions
rather than definitive diagnosis. This is due to these findings requiring
additional controlled, prospective and double blind studies for validations.
The ultimate treatment decisions are between you and your physician(s).
For more details on MCG analysis, please visit http://www.premierheart.com/webapp/tech.php
.
|